Latest News

London, sue capital of the world

E-mail Print PDF

from The Globe and Mail, 13th February 2010

An unlikely group of scientists, stand-up comedians, novelists and human-rights activists are campaigning to reform Britain's stringent libel laws, Elizabeth Renzetti writes

LONDON -- Even halfway around the world, Britain's libel laws have the power to silence dissent. English science writer Simon Singh discovered this when he was interviewed by an Australian journalist about a book he had co-written, Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial. The journalist went off to write a story about homeopathy, only to have the newspaper's lawyers kill it before publication. They were worried about being charged with defamation in London, almost 20,000 kilometres away.

London's reputation as a centre for libel claims - in local slang, it's "the town called sue" - has become so dire, according to law-reform advocates, that it poses a real threat to scientific, academic and press freedom. "Libel tourism" refers to court cases tried in London even if none of the litigants, or even the publication, is based here.

Critics of Britain's moth-eaten libel laws like to cite the examples as if they are reading from a novel by Franz Kafka: A Danish radiologist speaks at a conference in Oxford and is sued by a U.S. company; a British cardiologist, attending a conference in Washington, is quoted in a U.S. online magazine and is taken to court in London by a Boston-based medical manufacturer.

Now, a wide-ranging group including scientists, stand-up comedians, novelists and human-rights activists is throwing its support behind a campaign to reform libel laws.

Read more...

Simon Singh's weird idea that might just work

E-mail Print PDF

From Simon Singh:

Dear Friends,

I’ve had an idea – an unusual idea, but I think it might just work.

As you know, England ’s chilling libel laws need to be reformed. One way to help achieve this is for 100,000 people to sign the petition for libel reform before the political parties write their manifestos for the election. We have 17,000 signatures, but we really need 100,000, and we need your help to get there.

www.libelreform.org/sign

My idea

My idea is simple: if everyone who has already signed up persuades just one more person each week to sign the petition then we will reach our goal within a month!

One person per week is all we need, but please spread the word as much as you can. In fact, if you persuade 10 people to sign up then email me ( This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ) and I promise to thank you by printing your name in my next book … which I will start writing as soon as I have put my own libel case behind me. I cannot say when this will be, but it is a very real promise. My only caveat is that I will limit this to the first thousand people who recruit ten supporters.

When persuading your friends remember to tell them:

(a) English libel laws have been condemned by the UN Human Rights Committee.

 

Read more...

Libel in the news this weekend

E-mail Print PDF

 

This weekend John Kampfner, CEO of Index on Censorship, explained in an article for the Independent the scope and the sources of recent resistance to the Libel Reform Campaign. John outlined three main groups that for varying reasons see little benefit in reforming the UK libel laws and have been the main sources of criticism: large legal firms fearing the depletion of a key source of revenue, senior lawyers and judges who dislike to be put on the spot by inquisitive third sector organisations and the individuals that have profited or otherwise done well out of the existing system. The article further discusses how libel law, injunctions and super-injunctions are being used to tilt the balance between public- and private life in order to ensure that the media does not report facts about the rich and powerful that they find embarrassing. It is thus a fact that powerful and influential forces have entered the fray on the side of the opposition in the debate around libel reform.

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/john-kampfner-let-battle-commence-over-privacy-1890917.html

Nick Cohen this Sunday wrote a strong piece for the Guardian in favour of the campaign as he lambasted a recent speech by Lord Hoffman where the retired law lord branded the international criticism of the UK libel laws as a neocon scam. Alleging that the complaints about ‘libel tourism’ come entirely from America, Lord Hoffman brings forward the example of a libel case brought by Saudi Khalid Bin Mahfouz against American Rachel Ehrenfeld. Nick Cohen brings in his article us up to date with the circumstances of that particular case and the fallacies that Lord Hoffman utilises to make his point. He also continues to bring up cases where powerful persons and institutions from Denmark, Ukraine and the Democratic Republic of Congo, with little connection to the UK, take advantage of the UK libel laws to silence critics or publications deemed as inappropriate.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/07/nick-cohen-law-courts-libel

Another libel case is hitting the headlines this week with Russian billionaire Boris Berezovsky suing Vladimir Terluk. Mr Terluk, under the pseudonym Pyotr alleges that Berezovsky forced him to partake in a conspiracy with the goal of convincing the British authorities that Berezovsky could not return to Russia for fear of his life, thereby avoiding to stand trial in Russia for the allegations made both by Terluk and former KGB officer Andrei Lugovoi. The accusations made by Terluk were broadcast on the programme Vesti Nedeli on RTR Planeta, a freeview channel available in the UK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/07/berezovsky-libel-battle-litvinenko-death

 

Page 10 of 18