Libel Reform Campaign responds to Scottish Law Commission Consultation

The Libel Reform Campaign has submitted a detailed response to the Scottish Law Commission's consultation on the law of defamation.

Recommendations

— A public interest defence must be introduced into Scots Law

— A 'serious harm' test to discourage trivial and vexatious claims

— A 'single publication rule' and a revision on limitation periods for when pursuers can sue

— For-profit companies and other 'non-natural persons' should not be able to sue for defamation. If corporations are allowed to sue, that they should have to show financial loss before bringing a claim

— The Derbyshire case law that prevents public bodies from suing citizens for defamation should be put into statute

— A jurisidictional test to discourage 'libel tourism'

— Defences of truth and honest opinion should be set out clearly in statute

— The fair retort' defence should remain in Scots Law

— Alternative methods of dispute resolution should be incorporated into any reform

— Communication to a third party must be a requisite for a defamation action to be brought

— Qualified privilege should be extended to the reporting of international legislatures, courts and tribunals

— A presumption against expensive jury trials in defamation cases

Read the full Libel Reform Campaign response to the Scottish Law Commission.

Want to find out more about the Libel Reform Campaign? Visit our contact page.